Opinion Piece by Kerry White: Opposing Forest and Recreation Act
Opposing Forest and Recreation Act
By Kerry White
The movement by environmental organizations to remove people from the land, both federally managed and private, has found a new friend in Senator Tester. The Montana Senator that went to San Francisco and the East Coast to finance his campaign is paying back all those green tea drinkers for all the money they gave him.
The Senator’s letter in the July 19th edition of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle is full of myths and deception. First and foremost is the title of the bill which he names the “Forest Jobs and Recreation Act”. The 7000 acres per year of never to be seen timber harvests will do nothing for the ailing industry. With over 1.6 million acres of beetle killed forest in the Beaverhead Deerlodge National Forest (B-D) it would take over 200 years to address just the dead trees that exist today at only 7000 acres per year harvested as proposed in the bill. The buzz words of restoration and stewardship logging is just another way to say, temporary jobs through road ripping projects. Never will the American public be able to benefit from this resource as the infrastructure will be gone. According to the energy analysis just completed by Steve Jennings of Dillon, over 3.4 billion dollars of biomass energy stands dead in the B-D.
Senator Tester also makes reference in the title to “Recreation” and how this will “protect” and “guarantee access” for multiple use recreation like ATV, snowmobiles, motorcycles and bicycles. How can this be so Senator Tester when 1000s of Montana citizens have contacted you in opposition to the Beaverhead Partnership Agreement which is what this bill really represents? The bill clearly has language that limits all snowmobiles to existing trails with no off trail riding. Many of the areas targeted for wilderness in the Senator’s bill have numerous roads and trails that will become off limits to over 97% of the recreating public. Less than 3% of the public recreates in wilderness areas according to a 2007 study done by the Forest Service in the B-D National Forest.
The Montana legislature in 2005 passed HJ9 out of the House of Representatives but the bill was stalled by then Senate President Jon Tester in a committee he chaired. Had this bill passed, a study would have been completed that analyzed the economic affect of wilderness on Montana both positive and negative. It was Mr. Tester in 2005 that refused to get the facts on the true adverse economic impacts that wilderness has on not only wildlife and watersheds but also to people and private property. Senator Barrett this year has announced that she will again introduce HJ9 in the 2011 legislature and I suggest to Senator Tester that we wait for the facts before locking up more land of no use.
According to Robin McCullogh, a professor at the Butte School of Mines, The B-D has vast reserves of precious metals that provide the raw materials for almost everything used in peoples day to day activities. He states that to lock land in wilderness before identifying the location of the mineral reserves present is like “cutting your nose off despite your face”. The proposed wilderness areas in this bill have many of these resources in them. The proposed wilderness areas in the bill also have private in-holdings. The B-D contains 1000s of small family mining claims. The Forest Service is required to provide “reasonable access” to these in-holdings in wilderness but as with the claims that existed in the Absorkee Beartooth wilderness when it was established the Forest Service made it harder and harder for these folks to access and work their claims. Those claims are now gone along with a part of our Montana heritage.
Several areas proposed for wilderness in the bill have active established grazing permits and Senator Tester is putting at risk those agricultural operations by removing the ability for the rancher to care for his animals when using the permitted area. No motorized or mechanized use is allowed in wilderness. For those that don’t understand the purpose of grazing leases, here is a short course of “Grazing 101”. Cattle winter on the rancher’s private land. In the summer when the rancher needs his private land to produce hay to carry the animals through the winter he needs a place to put them. He pays the Forest Service according to the AMU (animal management unit) price per animal. This benefits the land through natural fertilizer and reduces the fire hazard by reducing the grass fuel load. The grazing permit also greatly benefits the public by providing open space at no cost to the taxpayer. A sustainable and viable ranch operation provides the vast open space that we all enjoy everyday in Montana and the Senator should realize the damage this bill will most certainly do to this industry.
Senator Tester also states in his letter “as always, let me know what you think of the Forest Jobs Bill”. I have a friend that has been trying to contact Senator Tester’s office in D.C. for 2 weeks with not a single return call. Senator tester spoke at the annual Montana Wilderness Association meeting a couple months ago and promised a wilderness bill. When the people in the Southern part of the B-D heard about the Senator bringing forward a wilderness bill a number of people, including Senator Barrett, House Representative Welborn, Dillon Mayor Martin Malesich, Madison County Commissioner Dave Schultz, Chairman of the Beaverhead Economic Development Corporation J.S. Turner, Chairman of the Beaverhead Resource Use Committee Bill Allen and Beaverhead County Commissioners Tom Rice, Garth Haugland and Mike McGinley, who is currently the President of the Montana Association of Counties, all signed a letter asking the Senator to attend an important meeting in Dillon to discuss the economic impacts this bill would have on their cities and counties. I would have thought that Senator Tester would have responded to this invitation and the many concerns they had with putting more wilderness in their area but the Senator was a no show. Is this truly being a representative of the voters that elected the Senator?
I would hope that the people of Montana take a hard look at this 85 page bill and then try to contact Senator Tester with your reasons for opposing this legislation. Wilderness designations are forever and thank heavens Tester’s term in office is half over.
Kerry White is the Executive Director of Citizens for Balanced Use


Kerry White is one of the
Kerry White is one of the most informed citizen of Montana regaurding it's lands. This country is on its way down with people like Jon Tester representing our GREAT state. People better wake up. Read between the lines folks and put the dots together. All of it is being taken away from the American people, every aspect of our lives are changing drastically. The gov't is controling way to much of our lives. Kerry White is right on with what is going on in this state. Thank goodness Kerry is workin hard on keeping our lands open for the next generation. Wait and see what Tester and his cronies like Baucus have in store for the Montana people. Has anyone read the Health plan yet??? How about the finance dept that Baucus is in charge of. Not looking too good. Lets keep our lands open for the people and tell our gov't to leave us alone. Kerry keep up the great work you are doing for us in Montana.
Anyone who has taken a hard
Anyone who has taken a hard look at the management of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge Forest cannot disregard the likelihood of the mining industry having a hand in the determination of wilderness designation. Information on a proposed molybdenum mine on the northern boundary of the Torrey Mountain WSA is not readily available online. A history of mining activity in the Elkhorn Mining District steers local mindsets away from the economic stability of hunting, fishing and other recreation that is dependent upon clean water and preservation of wildlife. While Tester's bill calls for "mechanically treating" forests and environmentally sound logging practices, which I have complete confidence in, it also opens up hundreds of thousands of acres to unchecked off-road vehicle use--the biggest threat to our forests and wildlands. There is no mention in Tester's bill of money set aside to adequately police the abuse and destruction of irresponsible off-road ATV use, and the Forest Service, ATV use advocates, and all the players who have thrown their hats in the ring--the MWA, the Wildlife Federation, Trout Unlimited, The Wilderness Society, The Beaverhead-Deerlodge Parnership and the politicians including the local county commissioners have miserably failed in addressing or even acknowledging the problem and the inevitable consequences.
I am attempting to contact my friend Senator Tester about my concerns. I trust that he will listen wholeheartedly and consider my input as he has so many times in the past. It would be of Montana's best interests if the above-mentioned parties did likewise.
Lewis and Clark named the tributaries of the Jefferson River "Philanthrophy, Philosophy and Wisdom," after Jefferson's "three great virtues." Maybe we should all take a hard look at some virtues before we start patting each other on the back. A little more wisdom would be to the benefit of the future of Montana's sanctity.
Tim Faber
I do have some serious
I do have some serious concerns about the proposed legislation, and haven't yet made up my mind on it.
However, among the plethora of misrepresentations in Mr. White's column, this statement is a flat-out lie:
"The Montana legislature in 2005 passed HJ9 out of the House of Representatives but the bill was stalled by then Senate President Jon Tester in a committee he chaired."
I was an intern at the legislature in 2005. I attended the Senate Natural Resources committee hearing on this anti-wilderness resolution. Not only was Tester NOT the chair of that committee, he was not even ON the committee (or in attendance at the hearing)! I'm surprised Mr. White would even try to BS this one, as the Montana legislative record is easily accessed on the web:
http://www.leg.mt.gov/css/Sessions/59th/default.asp
To clarify my statement in
To clarify my statement in the letter I submitted and to acknowledge the inaccuracy that Tester was on the committee and in fact chair, Tester was the President of the Senate in 2005. On March 29th, 2005, at 3:03 pm, there was a blast motion to 2nd reading on HJ9. The then President Tester voted no that resulted in a 24 to 24 tie and HJ9 died. I consider Tester as the vote that killed this bill. I apologize for not correctly stating the facts in my article and it will not happen again. The fact remains the same that HJ9 would have evaluated the economic impact that wilderness has on Montana and Mr. Tester does not want the people of Montana to know how bad wilderness really is on our state economy and environment.
Also in response to anonymous and his false statement that HJ9 was "an anti-wilderness resolution", this is simply not true.
Kerry White CBU
This seems like another
This seems like another example of people only looking at one side and not seeing the big picture.
I think we need to be thanking Sen. Tester for taking a strong leadership stand on this. If this step hadn't been taken our forests might have passed the point of no return.
In addition, Mr. White's piece has inaccuracies that make me question where he is getting his information from .
Who is Mr. White working
Who is Mr. White working for? He crows a lot about "access" but as I recall his CBU group FOUGHT the successful river access/landowner protection bill that passed the last Legislature. He comes across like someone who likes to fight more htan he likes to fix problems.
Mr. White continues the
Mr. White continues the tired old shouting and misinformation from the no-compromise crowd that put our forests and mills in today's dire situation.
I applaud the diverse and courageous groups willing to sit down together and work together on proposals for their areas that will benefit Montana's forests, protect our drinking water, save our timber mills, and support local communities.
Mr. White was approached numerous times to see if CBU was willing to sit down and join this collaboration, but he refused each time. I guess he was too busy trying to deny Montana sportsmen access to our rivers and streams.
Thank you Senator Tester for introducing the Forest Jobs bill. Don't listen to the nonsense and misinformation in this rant. You enjoy broad support from Montanans on this bill and we applaud your leadership.
This article makes the most
This article makes the most sense since I've heard in awhile. Anyone who doesn't have a problem giving up amazing areas to access is probably someone who doesn't care if they can access them to being with. Let me ask any of you who do access these amazing areas. How do you get there? What's going to happen when you now have to park on the highway and hike 15 miles just to get to the original trail head. Don't tell me it's no big deal or Wilderness Areas are a good thing. They are outdated and only please people who's TRUE intentions are kicking ALL of the public out. There's better ways of protecting an area then just kicking out certain user groups and not managing the forest at all. That's another thing that I don't get is how is a Wilderness Area being protected when it isn't managed? Wild fires and beetles come to my mind when I think of forest not being managed.
There's enough Wilderness Areas, if we want to protect an area for industrial purposes then let's get a new dedication to do just that. If you want to enjoy the outdoors with out motorized users then go into the already millions of acres that don't allow them. Whether you believe it or even care there isn't much areas for motorized users anymore and it's starting to affect the towns that rely on them.
Wow you guys actually think
Wow
you guys actually think this logging bill is catering to the left?
That opinion demonstartes how extremist right wingers you truly are. This bill opens roaldess areas, protects as wilderness only high-elevation areas (with the exception of the Yaak) and sets logging and minnig and motorized acess at very high levels. The vast majority of pulbic lands in MT and else where are heavily roaded providing motorheads with thousands of miles of roads. This bill is bs for remaining roadless areas and for all those who want to protect them. Rioght wing conspiracy bs that wilderness areas are attempting to kick people off the land is laughable. These are areas that allow you to get away from the what the vast majorority of america has become. Over-crwoded, roaded and filled with motorheads who will whine and complain about acess at the slightest road closure claiming the feds are trying to lock us out. You lazy bums need to get off your ass and enter some truly wild country.
you wont have to hike from the highway..more nonsense
Montana national forest is only 3.5% wilderness
this bill is terrible becuase it only protects roughly 10% of the wilderness possible in MT and you say thats still not fair. A 90-10 split i your favor is still not fair. In actuality you nutters are the greatest threat to our public lands and the american way of life which has laways included truly wild country.
Also the pine beetle infestation is the result of right wing fire management for decades so dont try to scapegoat enviros on that one.
Protect all remaining roadless lands as tester promised.
I agree with you! What is a
I agree with you! What is a matter with these people? When the wilderness is gone it is gone! Give this bunch an inch and they will be logging our national parks!